Skip to content

Emerging market debt (EMD) has become a common allocation for institutional investors seeking enhanced yield and diversification. Often allocations are through benchmark-driven approaches, which can limit the ability of investors to fully harness the opportunities available.

Key takeaways

  1. Flawed benchmarks: Popular EMD indices focus on larger, more developed countries, leading to concentration risk, suboptimal yields, and limited diversification.
  2. Expanding horizons: A more forward-looking approach could include selective exposure to frontier markets, local currency bonds, and corporate debt.
  3. Better outcomes: Broadening the EMD universe can enhance diversification, improve yield, and reduce downside risk.

Introduction: Rethinking the blueprint for EMD

Emerging market debt (EMD) has become a staple allocation for investors looking to enhance diversification and yield. However, relying on benchmark-driven strategies often undermines these goals. Active managers are frequently constrained by benchmarks, and passive strategies based on debt-weighted indices tend to overemphasize larger, developed markets, leaving valuable opportunities untapped.

One major concern is concentration risk. For example, over 60% of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Index is allocated to just 10 countries. This limits exposure to smaller, less efficient markets where active managers could potentially generate higher alpha.

Furthermore, many indices exclude crucial segments, such as frontier markets, local currency bonds, and corporate debt, which restricts investors from fully tapping into the growth potential of emerging markets. These indices also tend to have a higher proportion of investment-grade bonds, which results in lower yields and underrepresents higher-yielding opportunities.

To address these limitations, we propose a more expansive blueprint that includes frontier markets, local currency bonds, and corporate debt. This broader approach should enhance diversification, improve yield, and reduce downside risk.

Frontier markets: Selective opportunities for growth

Often seen as riskier, frontier markets (FMs) are frequently underutilised by investors. However, when thoughtfully integrated into broader EMD strategies, they can offer significant advantages. Over the long term, FM bonds have outperformed their emerging market counterparts, benefiting from unique structural characteristics that can reduce drawdown risks.

Risk concerns are further mitigated by the robust support these economies receive during times of global stress. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) acted as a lender of last resort to many frontier economies. Additionally, financing initiatives from multilateral organisations have helped strengthen FMs' credit profiles and address short-term liquidity challenges (see chart below).

This combination of performance potential and external support makes frontier markets a strategic addition to EMD portfolios. By adopting a selective approach, investors can tap into higher returns while managing risk effectively.

Exhibit 1: Frontier Markets Have More Finding Options to Avoid Default

IMF Lending Data by Financing Vehicle (US$bn)

Source: International Monetary Fund, as of 9/30/2024.

Currencies: Don’t overlook their return potential

EMD indices typically focus on US dollar-denominated bonds, which implicitly exposes investors to a single long ‘bet’ on the US dollar. While this approach has delivered strong returns over the past decade due to dollar strength, history shows the opposite can occur during periods of dollar weakness, as experienced from 2004 to 2014.

Expanding EMD allocations to include local currency bonds can mitigate this risk, while offering diversification and return potential. Although local currency bonds have historically lagged hard currency bonds, individual country performance often varies significantly (see chart below). This variability enables skilled managers to uncover attractive opportunities, making local currency bonds a valuable addition to a well-rounded EMD strategy.

Exhibit 2: Selectivity Is Key to Investing in Local Currency Bonds Across Regimes

Relative Returns of Local Currency Bonds versus EMBI Global Diversified Hard Currency Index

Source: JP Morgan, as of 9/30/2024. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Corporate debt: Diversify beyond sovereign debt

While many EMD portfolios are concentrated in government-backed securities, corporate debt has seen remarkable growth and is now one of the largest segments of the global bond market, with over $13.9 trillion1 in outstanding issuance.

EM corporate debt provides exposure to structural growth themes, such as digitalisation, urbanisation, and rising consumer demand in emerging markets. Additionally, corporate bonds tend to be more liquid and diversified by sector, issuer, and country. They also offer lower interest rate sensitivity and higher credit quality compared to sovereign bonds (see chart below), thanks to diversified revenue streams and lower debt levels.

Incorporating corporate debt into EMD allocations can enhance yield potential, while reducing overall portfolio risk.

Exhibit 3: EM Corporate Bonds Can Broaden Diversification, Lower Duration, and Improve Quality

Index Characteristics

Source: JP Morgan, as of 9/30/2024. EV Sovereigns is represented by the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Index. EM Corporates represented by the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Index.

Conclusion: Creating a better EMD blueprint

The limitations of traditional EMD benchmarks have prompted some institutional investors to consider better strategies for improving outcomes. By expanding the investable universe to include frontier markets, local currency bonds, and corporate debt, we believe that investors can benefit from improved diversification, higher yield potential, and reduced downside risk.

Rather than relying solely on conventional benchmarks, we advocate for a more expansive, dynamic approach to EMD investing. This strategy can offer a larger opportunity set, supporting better long-term results while strengthening downside protection.

Download full paper (PDF)

Strategy Profile: Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Strategy

The strategy seeks a total return by investing mainly in debt obligations of sovereign, quasi-sovereign and corporate issuers located in emerging market countries.

  • Total return approach: Investments are not constrained by a benchmark. We only investing in countries and securities that are attractive.
  • Broad opportunity set: The investment universe includes currencies, sovereign, quasi-sovereign, and corporate issuers. The strategy invests in debt that is denominated in all hard currencies as well as local currencies
  • Experienced team: Managed by an experienced and deeply resourced team which has been investment in emerging market debt since 1996.


IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML). Registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL. FTIML is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Investments entail risks, the value of investments can go down as well as up and investors should be aware they might not get back the full value invested.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.