Skip to content

Preview

This paper analyses the artificial intelligence (AI) investment boom and the potential for a much-forecast bust.

We ask three important questions:

  1. How is AI investment funded? We consider whether it is self-funded through cash flow or debt.
  2. What will be the business model post launch? We think three distinct revenue streams are likely: First, advertising revenue cannibalizing search engines; second, subscription revenues from B2B customers and B2C firms; third, utility-style cash flows, because once AI is embedded in a system, it is needed forever.
  3. What is the competitive model? There is risk of oligopolistic competition, or collusion, which would invite the regulators’ wrath.

Bubbles, booms and busts: The story is always the same and has always ended in busts. The story typically serves as a parable about greed and avarice, misplaced hopes and destroyed lives. It is not an urban myth; it is real and resonates and repeats across centuries: Dutch tulips in 1637; the South Sea Bubble of 1720; railway mania during the 1850s in the United Kingdom and during the 1860s/1870s in the United States; the 1929 Wall Street crash, so infamous that mentioning the year alone is a reminder to investors; the dot-com crash of 2001; and the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008, which was so traumatic that we often fail to acknowledge the subprime mortgage boom that caused it. These are only the major events; between these notable examples are countless others of local and international importance, including in 1907, 1987 and others.

So, should we prepare for a new chapter of tears? Will the AI boom end in a bust?

In this article we will assess the size of this boom, including whether it is truly big enough to change the world. Another critical question is its financing, given all of the earlier busts came from the weight of debt. And we will look at how AI generates revenues and profits.

Only after discussing these topics can we then draw a conclusion about whether the boom is sustainable or more likely to end in a bust.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML). Registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL. FTIML is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Investments entail risks, the value of investments can go down as well as up and investors should be aware they might not get back the full value invested.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.