Skip to content

“The end of US exceptionalism” is a phrase increasingly echoed in financial circles, often cited to explain the recent outperformance of international stock markets. Indeed, most international markets have outperformed US indexes in US dollar terms in 2025.

As of April 30, 2025, the broader European benchmark STOXX Europe 600 Index outperformed the S&P 500 Index by over 20%, with the European benchmark up 20% and the S&P 500 about flat. Germany leads this rally, where the DAX Index is up over 33%.1

But does this signal the end of “US exceptionalism?” That depends on how we define it. If we define US exceptionalism as the dynamism, entrepreneurship, and risk-taking culture that drives innovation and commercialization, then little has changed. While the United States faces policy-induced uncertainty, the fundamental strengths of its economy remain intact. At worst, we believe they have suffered a minor flesh wound, not a fatal blow.

However, this does not mean international markets can’t continue to outperform. From 2009 to 2024, US markets outperformed international peers following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. But before that, there were prolonged periods—notably 1971–1982, 1982–1989, and 2000–2007—when international markets led. For the 2000–2007 period, the MSCI EAFE Index returned over 90%, while the S&P 500 Index returned just 14%.2 Emerging markets fared even better. At the time, the key drivers were attractive starting valuations, dollar weakness, interest in global diversification, and a commodity super cycle. Today, similar conditions are reemerging.

International equity valuations are attractive both relative to history and to US peers. As of April 30, 2025, the S&P 500 trades at nearly 23x earnings. Even excluding big tech, it trades at 20x—well above its 20-year historical range of 14x–17x. In contrast, the STOXX Europe 600 trades at about 14x, in line with its long-term average. European markets typically trade at a discount to US markets due to slower economic growth and a higher regulatory burden. But the current discount is wider than historical norms.

Growth dynamics are also shifting. While US growth is historically stronger due to better demographics and productivity, recent performance has been fueled by persistent fiscal stimulus. Since 2022, the US has run annual fiscal deficits exceeding 5% of gross domestic product. Meanwhile, Germany has kept its deficit below 3% annually. Coupled with high energy costs following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Europe’s industrial sector, especially Germany’s, has stagnated. Fortunately, this is reversing. As the United States tightens fiscal spending, Germany is expanding it. With energy prices falling even without a formal peace settlement in Ukraine, European growth is set to improve, potentially narrowing the gap with the United States. Historically, markets have tended to reward marginal change—and here, the shift is clear: US growth is slowing while European prospects are strengthening. This should be reflected in relative earnings trends.

Currency dynamics also favor international markets. The US dollar appears both technically weak and fundamentally overvalued. From 2000 to 2007, dollar weakness helped drive international outperformance. A similar trend may now be underway. The dollar has weakened in 2025 even during risk-off periods—a sharp contrast to its traditional role as a safe haven. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the dollar remains overvalued on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis compared to the euro, pound, and yen. Persistent dollar weakness would enhance US dollar-denominated returns from international equities.

Finally, diversification may be making a comeback. The late Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz famously called diversification “the only free lunch in investing.” Yet after 15 years of US dominance, global portfolios are heavily overweight US stocks, which now make up roughly two-thirds of global market capitalization. A modest reallocation toward international equities could trigger significant capital flows, which in turn could fuel relative outperformance—and further inflows.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML). Registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL. FTIML is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Investments entail risks, the value of investments can go down as well as up and investors should be aware they might not get back the full value invested.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.