Skip to content

The ripple of turbulence provoked by the February bond selloff could be a taste of what is to come later this year. If the vaccines are successful in putting the pandemic behind us, and the U.S. economy really starts to gain traction, it is possible that capital markets could truly start to rumble.

For Rising Yields, Pace Is Important

Most seem to agree that the cause of February’s market turbulence was the speed of the selloff in Treasuries, not the direction. Equilibrium yields and rates should go up as the economy reopens. Chinese 10-year yields renormalized to pre-pandemic levels by September 2020 because the domestic economy recovered quickly due to prompt control of the outbreak through strict social isolation compliance as only China could enforce. In the U.S., 10-year Treasury yields also finally renormalized to pre-pandemic levels last month, coinciding with the level of real gross domestic product (GDP) more or less regaining its 2019 high-water mark, at least based on the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDP Nowcast current quarter growth estimates.

That was essentially Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell’s message in late February when he refrained from giving any sign of possible intervention in the bond market. With credit spreads near record lows, it is hard to make a case for any kind of restrictive financing conditions in the marketplace. So far, the rise in yields is in line with the restoration of pre-pandemic levels of activity in real GDP.

The bull story is that as long as yields increase gradually or at least in step with the pace of economic renormalization, capital should rotate from long-duration assets, like the big-cap growth stocks, into deep-value cyclical and small-cap equities while nominal GDP recovers. If for some reason the rise in interest rates is more rapid, there could be volatility. During late February, for example, the turbulence caused by the bond market was enough to pull the broad market lower, not just the big-cap growth stocks, at least briefly.

Factors Are Aligned For An Historic Boom

When considering what could create a more disorderly selloff in the bond market, a few things are worth noting:

  • The Chinese bond market has been stable for almost six months since renormalizing. However, China’s macro policies have reversed. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) raised rates 50 basis points late last year, fiscal policy has become a drag, the credit impulse is rolling over, and the renminbi (RMB) is up about 5% against the U.S. dollar. In contrast, U.S. policymakers keep adding more fuel to the fire as the economy recovers. The Fed wants the economy to run hot enough for inflation to overshoot 2% for a while. Meanwhile, the dollar is down about 5% from its starting point in 2020.
  • The latest round of U.S. stimulus comes with the 5-year breakeven inflation rate at its highest level since the global financial crisis (GFC), after rebounding from its lowest level a year ago. Put another way, the CARES Act $2 trillion fiscal relief program came with the economy in a free fall and breakevens at their lowest level since the GFC. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 is almost of the same magnitude with the economy in a V-shaped recovery mode and breakeven inflation rates breaking out.

U.S. Five-Year Breakeven Inflation Expectations

%, As of 3/11/2021

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.
  • Even some establishment Keynesian economists who support Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s call to “go big” argue that the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 might be too big, a view debated in a recent Markus Academy webinar with Lawrence Summers and Paul Krugman, hosted by Princeton University on February 12, 2021.
  • More fiscal stimulus is expected later this year in the form of a multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure spending program that the Biden administration is developing under the Build Back Better plan.
  • Credible private sector forecasters are scrambling to revise their growth outlooks higher with many seeing a hiring boom driving unemployment to pre-pandemic rates sometime in 2022. Government agencies, on the other hand, appear to remain flat-footed on the speed of the rebound unfolding. The Fed is notoriously out of kilter with market expectations. The “dot plot” rate profile consistently exceeded market expectations for most of the period since the GFC. Now, the discrepancy has flipped with the market looking for rate increases well in advance of the timeline indicated by the central bank’s forward guidance.
  • The Fed has remained calm about the inflation outlook, yet a variety of inflation indicators are pointing higher. Core PCE-based inflation should easily take out the 2% rate based on its historical correlation with the 5-year breakeven inflation rate.

U.S. Inflation Indicator Points to Higher Inflation

% (Left), Annual % Change (Right), As of 1/31/2021

Source: Macrobond. Indexes are unmanaged, and one cannot invest directly in an index. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

None of these factors take into account the most important positive macro-influence on the economy, which is the reopening of the economy if the vaccines are effective and widely adopted.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, often threw a wet blanket on the former administration’s pandemic comments last year when he felt they were too optimistic. His view changed significantly at the end of 2020 on news of the vaccines, and he openly predicted that America’s football stadiums could be full in September. If that prediction proves true, it will represent a sea change in peoples’ behavior and be a major positive impulse to economic growth, to understate the case for an historic boom.

What Is Keeping Bond Yields In Check?

What is keeping bond yields in check considering these risk factors? One of the most popular explanations is the Fed and financial repression. The main argument supporting this view is that the scale of the Fed’s balance sheet expansion has roughly matched net new Treasury issuance last year, which is what one would expect from a Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) approach.

But the story is more complicated. There is no denying the scale of Fed Treasury purchases. Yet, previous quantitative expansion of the balance sheet has been associated with rising bond yields, which is the case again. In addition, the dollar should be a lot weaker if the Fed is artificially depressing real interest rates below equilibrium. Instead, the dollar is off a measly 5% from where it started in 2020 despite trillions in balance sheet expansion, an historic regime change in U.S. monetary policy, and budget deficits to kingdom come. The relative stability of the greenback in the face of these developments speaks to an underlying enormous demand for dollar liquidity. As Chart 3 shows, the case for higher long-term inflation expectations and bond yields seems on hold without a significantly weaker dollar.

The U.S. Dollar and Inflation Expectations

Index (Left), % (Right), As of 3/11/2021

Source: Bloomberg Finance, L.P. Index are unmanaged, and one cannot invest directly in an index. They do not include fees, expenses, or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicatior of future performance.

In my view, the demand for dollars is coming from the private sector. U.S. rates remain attractive relative to other countries, which encourages foreign capital flows into dollars. However, the biggest source of dollar demand comes from U.S. domestic capital. The collapse in the velocity of money, the surge in bank deposits, and dramatic increase in household savings all point in the direction of an extraordinary increase in the demand for dollar liquidity. Most of this private sector money has supported Treasuries. Bank deposits soared by several trillion, which banks used to buy Treasuries and then sold to the Fed. Those Treasury securities have been replaced with excess reserves. The Fed effectively has taken in notes and bonds in exchange for Treasury bill-like instruments, called excess reserves. These excess reserves are not money in the usual sense since they can only be held by commercial banks, and they remain dead money to the economy unless loan demand picks up. This action to accommodate the public’s demand for dollar liquidity was able to stop and then reverse the move higher in the dollar last March. However, the net effect has left the dollar only marginally lower than it was at the start of 2020 and bond yields at about the same level.

Confidence, Fed Reaction Are Key To What Comes Next

Unlocking this extraordinary demand for U.S. liquidity is the key to gauging when the next leg of the U.S. bond bear market will take place, and if/when the dollar is ready to swoon. Market drivers will be confidence and the reaction of the Fed. It was fear of the pandemic and government-ordered lockdowns that drove the demand for liquidity in the first place. It makes sense that relief over the pandemic’s end and green lights from governments will be the keys to unwinding some or all of this unusual dollar demand. How the Fed reacts to this development will be an important part of the story concerning bonds and the dollar. If it stays true to current guidance, failure to react to a drop in the demand for dollars without curbing balance sheet expansion will amount to another flush of stimulus. Eventually, the Fed will likely react sensibly but its response will be late. If Dr. Fauci is correct, and the stadiums are full in September, the biggest rumbles in the latter part of the year may not be on the football field.

Subscribe for our latest Fixed Income updates

* I agree to be contacted by Franklin Templeton and understand that I am providing the e-mail address which is used for business-related purposes.

 

* Required fields



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML). Registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL. FTIML is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Investments entail risks, the value of investments can go down as well as up and investors should be aware they might not get back the full value invested.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.